Great Itinerary - Disappointing Ship

Queen Anne Cruise Review

Cruises: 7+ cruises
Reviews: 3
Helpful Votes: 4

Overall rating:

4.4 out of 5
Queen Anne

7 Night Cities Of Western Europe (Southampton Roundtrip)

Sail date: December 15, 2024

Ship: Queen Anne

Traveled as: Singles/Friends

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Review summary

Great itinerary ports, especially if you are into Christmas markets or Northern European history and art. However, the ship design is generally poor compared to its sisters’.

Embarkation

5 out of 5
Very speedy and smooth embarkation at Southampton Ocean Terminal

Ship experiences

Food and Dining

5 out of 5
Excellent dining, as always on Cunard. At the Britannia Club Restaurant they went particularly overboard to accommodate my dietary requirements, which I deeply appreciated.

Onboard Activities

4 out of 5
Bingo, trivia and so on are always available on sea days. On port days, there’s less to do for those who decide not to go ashore for once.

Service and Staff

4 out of 5
This was a different experience compared to my earlier Cunard cruises. On reflection, it looked like some of the new staff were not properly trained for their job. Some could barely speak any English, especially at the buffet on deck 9, and it was clear that they had not been even taught the usual, cultural social cues that an Anglo-American passenger would normally expect. As originally from abroad myself, I know how important such cues are in the hospitality sector, especially when the company prides itself in offering a ‘White-Star service’. Astonishingly, I also came across a couple of instances of rudeness from a waiter towards other passengers. It also seemed that some venues were worse off than others: staff at the Britannia Club Restaurant was excellent, whereas some of the waiters at the Golden Lion Pub and Commodore Coub had clearly not been properly prepared.

Ship Quality

3 out of 5
This has probably been the most disappointing part of the cruise itself. Some of the ship’s decors are stunning, no question of that, but it is clear that there has been some lack of insight in the ship’s design. The most noticeable features were the following: - The Queen’s Room is definitely too small and is nothing comparable to its counterpart on the other ships; there’s barely any room for activities there. - For a ship this new, I was astonished at the poor state of some of its services: in some bathrooms I found cracks on urinal, cracks on walls, walls were the panelling had bloated up; in our cabin, the panelling on the ceiling also got indented at some point because of a draught. - The Buffet area on Deck 9 feels much narrower than its counterpart on Queen Victoria; this created some congestion problems during busy times. - Apparent lack of service lifts for staff. I’ve seen some of the staff with their cleaning equipment waiting for passenger lifts in order to move around. Moreover, the night before disembarkation, the waiting areas on every deck around the lifts were jam-packed with passengers’ suitcases waiting to be taken downstairs for disembarkation. - Lack of a continuous, uninterrupted open deck upstairs. You could not take a walk around the whole of Deck 10/11 as the Grills space is right in the middle and it’s blocked off. If you were aft and wanted to reach the Commodore Club, you would have to go through the buffet area and pavilion to do so; - In order to have balcony cabins with no obstructed views, the lifeboats have been lowered onto the promenade deck( Deck3). This means that sea views there are totally obstructed, especially if you fancy taking a walk there.

Cabin / Stateroom

4 out of 5
It felt smaller than a usual balcony cabin on other ships. It looks like space has been reduced in order to accommodate as many passengers as possible. The bathroom was new, and the shower with glass doors was a great addition. Admittedly, though, there’s barely any space to move around. More astonishingly, I’ve also visited a Princess Suite whilst on board and didn’t look any different from my balcony cabin - just somewhat deeper, but with basically the same features and bathroom.

Ship tip

This is not like the other Cunarders: it’s a bit of a mishmash with, unfortunately, some poor design affecting it

Ports of call

Zeebrugge (Bruges), Belgium

5 out of 5
Bruges is a lovely town, if touristy. It has retained its medieval core by thankfully bypassing both industrialisation and war bombings. Some museums are also excellent: I particularly recommend the Groeninge Museum and the Sint Janshospitaal if you are into the early Flemish painters of the 1400s. There are great specimens here, including Van Eyck, Hans Memling and Roger van der Weyden.

Hamburg, Germany

5 out of 5
From this port we took a half-day trip to Lübeck. The town is small, but really pleasant and makes for a wonderful stroll around steeped in history. The guide was also very knowledgeable, though I wish we had been flyover some more extra free time to wander about.

Le Havre (Paris), France

5 out of 5
We took a train to Rouen and explored independently. The town is very pleasant, with some adorable alleyways which survived the WWII bombings which affected much of the town. The cathedral is worth visiting for its 13th-century stained glasses.

Disembarkation

5 out of 5
Very speedy and smooth disembarkation process at Southampton Ocean Terminal

Traveler Photos

Was this review helpful? 2

4 Comments

bubbles60     19 hours ago

Interesting itinerary

Gwbigdog     21 hours ago

Thanks for sharing your cruise

cruising2004     23 hours ago

Agree, wonderful itinerary! Thank you for your detailed review. Glad you had a great cruise.

HeavySeas     1 day ago

Thanks for sharing your cruise experience